Archives

All posts by Christopher

January 2017

It’s under 60°. In Los Angeles that’s, um… cold. I’m under the weather, which is unusual. More unusual is that I’ve been fighting this malaise for over three weeks. Flu? Winter blues? Cracked header on Jeep leaking CO into cab? Dunno.

What is certain is I’d like to feel better. My friend Nancy, a physician, recommends strong medication. Stat! She’s means, “Dude, whip up your awesome chicken soup— A Bowl of Seasonal Warmth would be great right now. “Yeah, maybe.” I say, “But I’m not all that hungry. I’m thinking more along the lines of a hot toddy made with Hibiki whisky.” She says, “Dude, you don’t have to eat it, just make it.” (Meaning she’ll eat it.) Nice.

I head to Whole Foods to fill the Rx.

Ingredients:

  • Two bunches of celery.
  • Eight multi-colored carrots.
  • One big yellow onion.
  • Five yellow potatoes.
  • One bulb of garlic.
  • One leek.
  • Himalayan pink salt.
  • Black pepper.
  • Bragg organic “Sprinkle” herbs and spices seasoning.
  • Organic, extra virgin olive oil.
  • Five chicken legs, separated into thighs / drumsticks.
  • About three quarts of spring water.

Thirty minutes and forty-five dollars later I’m at home, and the prep begins.

Tools:

  • One big pot— I use an 8q Calphalon pasta pot.
  • 10” Skillet— I use a 100 year-old cast iron skillet.
  • 8″ Chef’s knife.
  • Serving spoon.

Compounding:

My process is simple. Chop celery and carrots into 1/2” pieces. Cut onion and potatoes into quarters, then halve the quarters. Peel garlic and slice each clove in half.

Sauté celery, carrots, onion and garlic in skillet, one at a time, with olive oil and Bragg seasoning. (Five minutes, or so.)

Stand leek on end in big pot, add potatoes, chicken, and sautéed veggies. Add water to cover contents, and salt and pepper to taste— for me that’s 3 tbsp of salt and 1 tbsp of pepper.

Fire up burner and bring to boil, then reduce heat to simmer. Stir carefully, put lid on (it won’t cover pot completely because of the leek), and every so often stir again. Cook until potatoes are soft, maybe an hour-and-fifteen minutes. And then, soup’s on!

 

Chicken Soup Rx

Chicken Soup— Just What the Doctor Ordered!

Dosage:

A taste from the pot is promising. First bowl— mmmmm!— perhaps the best I’ve made. Second bowl, just as good. And, if some is good, more is better! Third bowl— don’t know that I’m well yet, but I am feeling better. Hey Nancy, your prescription is right on!

But, with half the batch gone already, you better drop by soon.

How’s That?

As astounding a run as it is in the 2016 Olympic 400m men’s final, Wayde van Niekerk leaves even greater speed untapped. How’s that? Notice that in these video stills he doesn’t begin falling until about 13° past the vertical! He ultimately reaches about 30° of Fall which clearly is sufficient for setting a World Record of 43.03″, but what if he begins falling at 0°? Like previous WR holder, Michael Johnson, and his mentor Usain Bolt.

van Niekerk at Vertical Moment

Wayde van Niekerk hits the Vertical Moment of his running stride.

van Niekerk at Pose Position

Here, van Niekerk reaches the Running Pose at about 13° from the vertical.

van Niekerk at end of Fall

Then, at about 30° from vertical, van Niekerk reaches the end of his Range of Fall. 

 

Why?

By the way, there is a reason for this, and it can be seen in this video still. By leaving the previous support behind (his right foot, in this case) after his bodyweight passes over it, van Niekerk is forced to coast past the ideal midpoint of the running stride stride— the Vertical Moment— before he’s able to start falling again.

van Niekerk Flight Phase

Late recovery of support leg prevents reaching Running Pose “on time.”

 

Not Harder, Smarter!

Wayde van Niekerk has the talent— that is, exceptional neural, metabolic and psychological capacity— to continue developing as a runner, and it’s inspiring to anticipate his realizing even grander achievements in the coming years. I suspect more records will be set as he further refines his skills, maybe harnessing those unused 13°. And why wouldn’t he? Since it’s said that we’re either striving to move forward or allowing ourselves to drop behind, and, since van Niekerk set a new WR from lane 8, effectively racing against himself, it’s really a foregone conclusion. That’s what he does. You see, genetic potential is quickly reached— we compete against our physiological peers— but skill can always be improved. Greatly, in fact, and at any age. And, while not the only factor in racing, skill is a primary factor. While no one needs to work harder per se to acquire new / refine current skills, they must work smarter. That begins with knowing precisely what to train.

You can learn more about how you can apply the skills of Pose, Fall, Pull to your own running success, right now. Start here:  Correct Running Form.

 

Reaction to Tragedy

Ultimately, it’s impossible to engage in a rational discussion with those who would reactively scapegoat guns and gun owners. Their mental state is not dissimilar to Elliot Rodger‘s who, because of an overwhelm of emotion, went on an indiscriminate killing rampage.

“Why did Chris die?” Richard Martinez said at a press conference. “Chris died because of craven, irresponsible politicians and the NRA. They talk about gun rights, what about Chris’ right to live? When will this insanity stop?”
— Richard Martinez (a gun shot victim’s father)

Note, too, that this was not just another shooting, though it’s hard to tell from steeply slanted media reports. It was also a stabbing, and an assault with a deadly weapon, a car.

Three of the seven were stabbed to death. Are the three stabbing victims any less dead? Was it somehow better for them to die by having their flesh, veins, arteries, heart, lungs, liver and whatever other organs repeatedly punctured and lacerated?

Is the sudden and sometimes prolonged violence of a car slamming into a bike rider, smashing bones and bashing internal organs, somehow preferable to a bullet wound? Of course the killer could have easily taken many, many more lives by ramming his car into groups of people, but it wouldn’t have been perceived as being as terrorizing, would it?

(That distinction— conditioning— is important, but I’ll cover that another time.)

You see, those who would decry this event as a mass shooting, demean guns, gun owners, and the NRA— a gun safety and educational organization, by the way, that includes a proactively safe attitude in firearms handling— are, like the killer, simply lashing out at anything they can identify as an enemy. It doesn’t have to actually be a legitimate foe, just a point of focus— a scapegoat. And these days guns are an easy target, albeit a dubious one.

So, until those who blame and demonize guns, gun owners, the NRA, along with logic, reason and reality can get control of their wild emotions they have no place at the table of meaningful discourse concerning any social policies. In fact, guns aside, in the interest of public safety, it is precisely those functionally impaired people who should be prevented from driving automobiles, possessing sharp instruments, holding positions of responsibility, interacting with impressionable children…and voting.

That’s right, as reason is surrendered to emotion our frontal lobes check out and our lizard brain takes over. Fight / flight. Reaction, not response.

Because those people clamoring on about guns continue to place feeling ahead of fact, emotion above reason, they are necessarily incapable of using sound logic and analysis in their decision making processes. As those people lose their mental capacities, they become a lynch mob.

Using Tragedy

Worse, there are those unscrupulous government officials, and media outlets that leverage such altered states into cultivating discriminatory sentiments and restrictive legislation.

Defrocked California State Senator Leland Yee— a most rabid gun control advocate— is a notorious example. Remember, Yee was caught attempting to disarm Californians as he was brokering deals to arm to the teeth, criminals and terrorists. Got that? He wanted to take away your last line of defense and provide real military weapons— that’s automatic, not semi-automatic guns, and rocket launchers!— to those who would commit crimes against you! Why? To make a buck.

“Senator Yee said, ‘Do I think we can make some money? I think we can make some money. Do I think we can get the goods? Yes, I think we can get the goods.'”
— from the actual indictment of Democrat State Senator Leland Yee.

Fortunately he’s now out of the running for CA Secretary of State.

Understanding Tragedy

Now, recognizing the fact that as civilized as we are our world can still be a dangerous place despite our best efforts. We cannot legislate or love our way out of that, but we can develop better awareness and take greater responsibility for ourselves.

We can now understand that inasmuch as our society provides about as good a place to live as has ever been, it also produces the kind of demented actions that wreak havoc within our peacefulness and serenity. This isn’t limited to physical violence that precipitated this post, it extends into cheating in sports, exploitive and disingenuous personal relationships, multinational corporate and banking malfeasance and political corruption, etc. Welcome to the jungle.

While the dog eat dog attitude that is natural to our earlier primitive cultures, those we like to believe we’ve risen above, it nonetheless continues within our so-called civilized lifestyles. What civilized people would cultivate the common afflictions we normally endure. Savagery like addiction to prescription medications, over the counter remedies and recreational drugs, nutritionally void processed foods, vapid entertainment, stifling entitlements and expectations, and a general dissociation with the natural world. All these are win / lose propositions. Consider now who is prospering at whose expense.

Even here, in 2014, in America, in California, in the enclave of Santa Barbara, and even within the guise of trust and cooperation the laws of the jungle are at work. Life, death, competition, bullying, winning, losing…retribution. It’s not right. It’s not wrong. It just is.

Preventing Tragedy

Our responsibility is to maintain some level of vigilance in protecting ourselves, not through prohibitive legislation— clearly that doesn’t and has never worked— but by understanding our world and its inherent dangers. Compared to most of the rest of the world we live in a very comfortable bubble. But, just as in the Yin / Yang symbol, there is a spot of light in darkness, and a spot of darkness in light. We just witnessed the latter.

But, in the tragedy that unfolded the other night a gun wasn’t the issue. Clearly this killer used other means of assault, too. The issue is recognizing danger signals, in this case symptoms of potential violent behavior, and finding suitable alternatives for the individual to find some sort of personal satisfaction, before an aggressive threshold is reached. Here, feelings have their place. What did the perpetrator want? Retribution. Yes, and before that? Acceptance, in whatever form. (Don’t we all?)

“It doesn’t make sense. I do everything I can to appear attractive to you,” Rodger said in a message to women in general. “I dress nice. I’m sophisticated. I’m magnificent. I have a nice car… I’m the ultimate gentleman. And yet, you girls you never give me a chance. I don’t know why.”
— Elliot Rodger

Thing is, that acceptance, for it to be valued, must come from those who are perceived as doing the rejecting. Oh, lots of reasonable, rational surrogate acceptance can be provided, but because we are dealing with feelings, viable alternatives are usually dismissed. Think of the child who wants the red toy. Take away the red toy, give it the blue or yellow toy and the child cries and rants. The child wants what it wants. Period.

“I didn’t want it to come to this,” Rodger said. “I desperately wanted a way out.”
— Elliot Rodger

I have to wonder, how might those closest to this individual have seen a condition, but not perceived the actual problem? How might we all be contributing to these sorts of things in our own social spheres?

As a hypnotherapist, I ask, “What do you want?” Then, my clients and I utilize trance to begin establishing a new set of options, behaviors that serve the needs of that individual, and that are ecologically appropriate, within context of the society. I believe there are always useful choices in what we do and in how we feel.

During a Tragedy

The events ended with seven deaths. Three by knife wounds, and four by a firearm. The fourth death, that of the perpetrator, came by a bullet to the head. Whether by his own or by a policeman’s, his demise came about only because he was confronted by a good guy with a gun.

And, it stands to reason that had one of the three stabbing victims been armed it’s likely this whole affair would have played out differently, and lives would have been saved.

References:

Media’s unusually sensible take on mass killings.

Though he stabbed fifty percent of his victims, it seems he’s still the “gunman”.

Father dismisses stabbing victims and blames NRA.

Motivation of killer.

Agenda driven late reporting on attempted gun runner, Leland Yee.

Notice how FOX reports on Leland Yee’s arrest and charges.

And, how SF Examiner reports on Leland Yee’s arrest and charges.

And, how Newsbusters reports on Leland Yee’s arrest and charges.

And, how Reuters reports on Leland Yee’s arrest and charges.

Leland Yee quotes.

Rush Limbaugh is on point regarding Leland Yee’s nefarious activities.

Kunming train station attack leaves dozens dead.

Student ‘Flashing knives’ stabs 22 at school.

Man stabs passengers aboard Taiwan train.

Gun control is way off target.

Brentwood, CA. 2008.

One morning a physician leaves his home in Mandeville Canyon, just as usual. At the same time, a dedicated group of bicyclists is completing their weekly ride which snakes past his house. They know each other already. They’ll get to know each other better. Or worse.

The riders’ gradual hill climb is a five mile time trial of sorts that reveals an hierarchy of fitness as the peloton of maybe fifty stretches and separates into small packs pedaling for between fifteen and thirty minutes. (FWIW, my times were a little better than 18 minutes. Not fast. Not slow.) The subsequent descent, depending on skill and derring do takes only a fraction of the uphill time. The cyclists rarely dip below the posted 25 mph limit, and many ride over 40mph.

Still, that’s too slow. For most– driving to work, dropping their kids at school, meeting their trainer at the gym, or what-have-you– customary automobile pace down this idyllic two lane road, with arching trees, pasture land and kids playing in yards is 40 to 50mph.

Most days cyclists and cars cooperate well enough. Some days individuals from one group or the other have been known to get a little testy. Today, hell breaks loose.

The doctor takes exception to the riders in his way. In anger, he curses them, speeds past, then swerves in front of a few and stomps his brakes. Crash!

One cyclist was flung face-first into the rear window of [the doctor’s] red Infiniti, breaking his front teeth and nose and cutting his face. The other cyclist slammed into the sidewalk and suffered a separated shoulder. — LA Times, January 8th, 2010

A police officer told jurors that shortly after the crash [the doctor] said he slammed on his brakes in front of the riders to “teach them a lesson.” — LA Times, January 8th, 2010

Yes — whether criminally or negligently– too many drivers are a danger to themselves and others, and cyclists are always vulnerable. But let me make clear that, having ridden with this group of cyclists myself, some arrogantly ride area roads with outrightly hostile traffic manners.

That’s right, cyclists aren’t all innocent, law-abiding victims. I fully understand drivers’ frustrations. Nonetheless, a car is no less intimidating nor any less lethal than a gun. But, cars themselves don’t cause accidents. And of course no reasonable person, not even an injured cyclist, would even think of putting a car on trial. Even as auto accidents kill over 45,000 Americans each year. Even as auto accidents are the leading cause of death of children, aged 10 to 19! That’s because to a rational mind, cars aren’t the problem.

Rather, a jury would convict this physician of mayhem, assault with a deadly weapon (his car), battery with serious injury, and reckless driving causing injury. He would be sentenced to five years in prison. Why? For allowing his emotions to dictate his actions.

“Danger to Self and Others.” When I hear this legal phrase applied willy-nilly to firearms ownership I think of those seeking to deprive citizens of their natural human right to self defense and how those crowing loudest about traumatized vets or others with general lifestyle troubles might just fail their own psychological litmus test. Not only with regard to guns, mind you, but within the context of everyday activity.

For instance, everyday in Los Angeles I see people driving (quite often in Obama / Biden branded) cars and SUVs with a wanton disregard for their own safety and the safety of others on the road. These menaces to society– and they are nothing less– are given the privilege of driving an automobile, and they habitually abuse it.

How? By intentionally breaking the law and texting while driving— not just typing a quick reply such as “on way” while stopped at a light, but rather swerving inside and outside their lane, sometimes into oncoming traffic while their heads are tilted down and their eyes focused on their smartphone screen as they are pecking furiously with both thumbs. Normally, these perpetrators are traveling at or above the posted speed limit, and frequently in residential, school, and construction zones.

Compare that aberrant, callous, anti-social driving behavior, and its resultant, astronomical daily rate of traffic fatalities and injuries to the hundreds of millions of guns in America owned by responsible, law abiding American citizens that remain safely idle in gun safes and that have not and never will cause injury nor death. Do the math– guns obviously are not a safety issue. Further, the FBI recently released it’s latest findings which show that even with far more guns in private hands than ever before, violent crime is at a forty-year low. Facts are facts.

Now, texting while driving is only one example. Others include cavalierly speeding through red lights and stop signs with (or without) a cellphone pressed to their ear. Yet another is carelessly whipping their car into a U-turn across two or three lanes of traffic, typically at speed and without so much as a glance over the shoulder. Or, get this, the driver who in mean-spirited interest of intimidating an approaching motorist making a late left turn at an intersection traffic signal, accelerates hard off his green light, aiming straight at the other driver. Regardless of outcome, this potentially deadly game of “chicken” is effectively criminal assault.

These drivers, without doubt, present a grave danger to themselves and others, and are arguably mentally imbalanced. How else could they continue to knowingly and routinely violate the law and put life, limb and property at undue risk? Do reasonable, rational people behave this way?

Do you know any such drivers? Could you be you such a driver?

Perhaps it’s time to preemptively remove these dangerous drivers from the road because isn’t it just a matter of time before they “accidentally” hurt or kill themselves, you, or one of your loved ones? How about, when licensing drivers a psychological stress test can be included as part of formal driver’s education? And, why not consider that any emotional outburst over the previous decade would preclude their being allowed apply for licensing in the first place? Or, maybe we can just ban cars and smartphones all together. LOL.

Actually, a good litmus test could be as simple as finding out whether people are fit to own and drive an automobile by checking whether they are able to put fact ahead of feeling when making decisions. Can they control their emotions well enough to rationally evaluate and navigate their circumstances? After all, giving in to infantile emotions and impulses– i.e., road rage, or choosing to text while driving– could very quickly lead to killing a whole family in one collision. It happens all the time. But, whether in heat of the moment loss of control, or a casualty of simple distraction such “accidental” death is doubly tragic because it’s so preventable.

Personally, I’d rather be shot and killed by an individual with ill intent than to become the collateral damage of some wholly oblivious teen, soccer mom, business exec, etc. whose careless text messaging trumps careful driving… Crash. OMG!

So even before cranking the engine we must ask ourselves,

Since being behind the wheel of a car is the same as having a finger on the trigger of a loaded gun, does my mental state make me a danger to myself or others?

And then consciously answer.